<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brent Laminack's Personal Site &#187; common sense politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laminack.com/category/common-sense-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laminack.com</link>
	<description>Random thoughts and experiments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:28:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why The Next Generation Won&#8217;t Observe MLK Day</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2010/01/18/why-the-next-generation-wont-observe-mlk-day/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2010/01/18/why-the-next-generation-wont-observe-mlk-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good morning all! Happy Martin Luther King Jr.&#8217;s Birthday (observed). I claim that a generation hence, our children won&#8217;t be celebrating MLK Day. Why? Look at history. Our parents celebrated Armistice Day on the 11th day of the 11th month. This is when the treaty ending World War I was signed. We celebrated Veterens&#8217; Day. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning all! Happy Martin Luther King Jr.&#8217;s Birthday (observed). I claim that a generation hence, our children won&#8217;t be celebrating MLK Day. Why? Look at history. Our parents celebrated Armistice Day on the 11th day of the 11th month. This is when the treaty ending World War I was signed. We celebrated Veterens&#8217; Day. I remember Washington&#8217;s Birthday and Lincoln&#8217;s Birthday. Now it&#8217;s President&#8217;s Day. Humanity&#8217;s collective memory blurs and generalizes. The specifics of the above celebrations turn into generalizations over the years. So I claim that a generation hence MLK day will be renamed &#8220;Civil Rights Day&#8221;. You can hear the rationale now: The Civil Rights movement was bigger than just one man, we need to celebrate all its leaders; it&#8217;s really the movement, not the man we should be remembering, etc. Time will tell if I&#8217;m right or not, but if the past is a gauge of the future I think it&#8217;s just a question of &#8216;when&#8217; not &#8216;if&#8217;.</p>
<p>On a side note: On his birth certificate, Martin Luther King Jr.&#8217;s first name as listed as &#8216;Michael&#8217;. Clearly a typo, because then he wouldn&#8217;t have been a &#8216;Jr&#8217;, would he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2010/01/18/why-the-next-generation-wont-observe-mlk-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Raising the Minimum Wage is Good&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/05/25/if-raising-the-minimum-wage-is-good/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/05/25/if-raising-the-minimum-wage-is-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years back, I heard a political debate among the minor candidates for Governor of Georgia (I believe). The Socialist candidate was running on a platform of &#8220;If elected, I&#8217;d immediately raise the minimum wage to $100&#8243; After all, if raising the minimum wage is good, why not go whole hog? Raising the minimum [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years back, I heard a political debate among the minor candidates for Governor of Georgia (I believe). The Socialist candidate was running on a platform of &#8220;If elected, I&#8217;d immediately raise the minimum wage to $100&#8243; After all, if raising the minimum wage is good, why not go whole hog? Raising the minimum wage to $100 would immediately make us all rich, right? Most people see the consequences at once. Either a) we&#8217;d all be immediately unemployed as all our jobs flew oversees or b) inflation would immediately make $100 spend like $10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/05/25/if-raising-the-minimum-wage-is-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Family that Works Together&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/03/24/the-family-that-works-together/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/03/24/the-family-that-works-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always think of that when I go into a Chick-fil-A and see the old photo taken in the Dwarf House of the Cathy family working there. In the photo are the boys: Dan and Bubba. The caption on the photo says they &#8220;greeted and entertained guests&#8221;. Yeah, right! Then how come they&#8217;re dressed as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always think of that when I go into a Chick-fil-A and see the old photo taken in the Dwarf House of the Cathy family working there. In the photo are the boys: Dan and Bubba. The caption on the photo says they &#8220;greeted and entertained guests&#8221;. Yeah, right! Then how come they&#8217;re dressed as bussers and have towels under their belts? They were working bussing tables! And I bet Truett didn&#8217;t pay them minimum wage!</p>
<p>Trent and Smally conducted studies of why some families are close and some not. Their conclusion was that families that work together against a common outside negative influence were closer. Through most of humanity&#8217;s existence fathers and sons, mothers and daughters have worked side-by-side againt the common evils of starvation and deprivation. Now we&#8217;re too sophisticated to allow that, and have minimum wage laws that prevent young men from working beside their fathers in the workplace. This is part of why the family structure has weakened in America. Thus I claim that eliminating the mimimum wage could be pro-family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/03/24/the-family-that-works-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Abortion: Where I Get in Trouble with Everyone</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/03/11/thoughts-on-abortion-where-i-get-in-trouble-with-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/03/11/thoughts-on-abortion-where-i-get-in-trouble-with-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, with all the talk about embyonic stem-cell research, I&#8217;m going to take a stance on abortion that will get me in trouble with everyone. Here goes: The two camps in the abortion debate are the pro-life group that says that life begins at the moment of conception and the pro-choice people that say that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, with all the talk about embyonic stem-cell research, I&#8217;m going to take a stance on abortion that will get me in trouble with everyone. Here goes:</p>
<p>The two camps in the abortion debate are the pro-life group that says that life begins at the moment of conception and the pro-choice people that say that a person&#8217;s rights begin at the moment of birth. I&#8217;m neither. I say that whatever yardstick we use to measure the end of life should be the same as what we use to measure it&#8217;s beginning. Medical science would tell us that when a certain type of brainwave stops, a person is clinically dead.  Apparently neither side of the abortion debate has any issue with that. I say that it&#8217;s only common sense to say that, therefore, when those same types of brain waves begin, the fetus is then a person and has rights.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m in trouble with everyone, because I&#8217;m not saying that live begins either at the moment of conception or personhood at the moment of birth, but somewhere in between. Right. But as far as I can see, my argument makes sense in the &#8220;what&#8217;s good for the goose is good for the gander&#8221; way. We need to use the same measure for the start of life as we do for the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/03/11/thoughts-on-abortion-where-i-get-in-trouble-with-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Illustration of Why Eliminating the Minimum Wage Was Good</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/02/28/an-illustration-of-why-eliminating-the-minimum-wage-was-good/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/02/28/an-illustration-of-why-eliminating-the-minimum-wage-was-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I worked at a manufacturing plant a couple of summers in high school and college (You Bremen people know who). In that facility, we used metal rivets to hold cases together. Rivets being what they were, they spilled onto the floor. The boss conducted a study where he swept up the shop floor, picked rivets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked at a manufacturing plant a couple of summers in high school and college (You Bremen people know who). In that facility, we used metal rivets to hold cases together. Rivets being what they were, they spilled onto the floor. The boss conducted a study where he swept up the shop floor, picked rivets out of the resulting pile of trash, and sorted the black rivets from the chrome ones, weighed them and returned them to the bins. He figured he could generate about $3 worth of reused rivets in an hour. The problem was the minimum wage at the time was $3.50. So it made no ecomomic sense to re-use the rivets. Going by the numbers, he should just sweep them out the door. However, he knew of a family in town that was in dire straights. The father was injured and unable to work and the family was in a very bad way. So the boss took in one of the young teen-age sons and paid him $2.50 an hour under the table for a couple of hours a day to pick out rivets. He wasn&#8217;t giving the kid a handout, but was helping him in a real, economically sound way.</p>
<p>Not only did this under-the-table arrangement help the struggling family, but it was an early form of recycling (before it was cool). Eliminating the minimum wage would enable many more materials to be cost-effectively recycled as illustrated in this story. So eliminating the minimum wage is actually <em><strong>Green</strong></em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/02/28/an-illustration-of-why-eliminating-the-minimum-wage-was-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Thoughts on the Minimum Wage</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/02/20/more-thoughts-on-the-minimum-wage/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/02/20/more-thoughts-on-the-minimum-wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;But you can&#8217;t live on that small a wage.&#8221; Right. Guess what? Working all day and having nothing to show for it is motivation to start working smarter. This is as old as Solomon. &#8220;The laborer&#8217;s appetite works for him; his hunger drives him on.&#8221; Proverbs 16:26 NIV. This isn&#8217;t talking about a lazy man [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But you can&#8217;t live on that small a wage.&#8221; Right. Guess what? Working all day and having nothing to show for it is motivation to start working smarter. This is as old as Solomon. &#8220;The laborer&#8217;s appetite works for him; his hunger drives him on.&#8221; <em>Proverbs 16:26 NIV</em>. This isn&#8217;t talking about a lazy man being hungry as Proverbs commonly does. This is talking about a man working hard and still being hungry. This is motivation. Having to provide the basics of food and shelter are the bottom-level motivation that gets people going. Sometimes in our contemporary American culture of luxury and entitlement, we forget the base realities of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/02/20/more-thoughts-on-the-minimum-wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Job Creation</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/02/14/more-on-job-creation/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/02/14/more-on-job-creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had some pushback from my suggestion that repealing the minimum wage would create a million jobs. &#8220;But nobody could feed a family of 4 on that kind of wage&#8221; is the general pushback. I never said one could. The jobs created would be entry-level jobs: mostly part-time and for teenagers. This answers several problems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had some pushback from my suggestion that repealing the minimum wage would create a million jobs. &#8220;But nobody could feed a family of 4 on that kind of wage&#8221; is the general pushback. I never said one could. The jobs created would be entry-level jobs: mostly part-time and for teenagers. This answers several problems like the Catch-22 of &#8220;All the jobs I see require experience, but how can I get experience without a job?&#8221; These entry-level jobs are just that: places to enter the workforce. They aren&#8217;t designed to be places to work your whole life. Oh, yes, creating a million entry-level jobs would by necessity create, what a hundred thousand new management jobs to oversee these new workers? Now we&#8217;re starting to see real job creation.</p>
<p>Is this what would really happen? Yes. Before President Johnson&#8217;s &#8220;Great Society&#8221; experiment where he raised the minimum wage, the unemployment rate among black male teenagers was actually <strong>lower</strong> than white male teenagers. Why? Because black male teenagers would generally work for lower wages. Raising the minimum wage threw tens of thousands of black male teenagers out of work. Minimum wage legislation is generally sponsored by trade unions trying to protect their jobs agains lower-wage competition. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s deliberate or not, but the minimum-wage legislation of the 1960s and 70s had a pronounced racial bias, destroying the jobs of disproportionately more blacks than whites. Again, I don&#8217;t know if that was the intent, but the result was definitely racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/02/14/more-on-job-creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A No-Cost Way to Generate a Million Jobs</title>
		<link>http://laminack.com/2009/01/27/a-no-cost-way-to-generate-a-million-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://laminack.com/2009/01/27/a-no-cost-way-to-generate-a-million-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[common sense politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laminack.com/2009/01/27/a-no-cost-way-to-generate-a-million-jobs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The politicos are proposing spending billions of dollars to create a couple of million jobs. Here&#8217;s a suggestion of a way to create a million jobs that requires no government spending. Ready? Simple: Eliminate the minimum wage. It&#8217;s that simple. Ask any economist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The politicos are proposing spending billions of dollars to create a couple of million jobs. Here&#8217;s a suggestion of a way to create a million jobs that requires no government spending. Ready? Simple:<br />
Eliminate the minimum wage.<br />
It&#8217;s that simple. Ask any economist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laminack.com/2009/01/27/a-no-cost-way-to-generate-a-million-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

